[Az-Geocaching] GC57 - documentation question

[ShadowAce]

I have posted log pictures before and never had a complaint about it.

 Interesting reading is really a nice kick to the adventure. :)

On 6/18/07, Steven Stringham <Steve at stringhams.org> wrote:
>
> The history is what I am aiming for. I really enjoyed reading the logs.
> I think it is great that the original log book is still there. There are
> logs from people from all over the world in there (though I concentrated
> on photos AZ cachers).
>
> I sent a couple of pages to Brian Casteel. (his, the first log, and one
> other). Here was his response:
>      "Man, I've certainly come a long way in my adventures in caching.
> September 2, 2001 was only a few weeks after I started.  How cool!
> Thanks for sending me the pics.  That rocks."
>
> I looked at Dan Rich's profile. He has two caches (one being GC57). He
> has only found 10. He has not logged in to the site for over a year. I
> would not concider this an active cacher. Yes, he owns the cache. And,
> yes I respect that. I sent an email to him (through the site) asking if
> I could post them. We shall see what the response, if any is.
>
> The respect for the cache owner is why I asked the original question.
> For those of you who have found the GC57 site, would those pics of the
> log book be of worth? Maybe. I sure enjoyed the reading. Also, for those
> who found it long ago, are the later logs of interest? Maybe.
>
> If this were any ordinary cache, I would be less likely to go through
> this trouble. This one, though. I find to be more interestingly
> historical.
>
> I did get an offer from Snaptek to host the pics on the AZGC site. Would
> this be appropriate?
>
> What say you all?
> Steven Stringham
> StringCachers
>
>
>
>
> azcachemeister at getnet.com wrote:
> > I agree with this sentiment. Although there is some qiute interesting
> history there, and it should be preserved.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:  Jake Olson
> > Date:  6/17/07 1:30
> > To:  listserv at azgeocaching.com
> > Subj:  Re: [Az-Geocaching] GC57 - documentation question
> >
> > To me at least, the cache owner is the one who should be the one to
> answer
> > the question if logbook pages should be published. For some, the
> privilege
> > of reading the log is only for those who actually venture to visit the
> > cache.  I would contact the owner of the cache first.
> >
> >
> > Jake - Team A.I.
> >
> > On 6/16/07, Steven Stringham <Steve at stringhams.org> wrote:
> >
> >> My daughter Rachel and I went out the Geocache (GC57) today. It was her
> >> 18th birthday. (This trip was her choice). Yeah. And we got Senda de
> >> Tonto (GCED as well.
> >>
> >> When we did GC57, we took a lot of pictures of the area, etc. These
> >> shots are fun to post on the cache page.
> >>
> >> But, we also took a lot of shots of the cache log. Different pages of
> >> high profile AZ cachers over time.  The intent was to document the
> >> contents of the log (it is getting pretty full). It is still the
> >> original log book from when it was hidden almost 7 years ago! Pretty
> cool.
> >>
> >> So, the question: Is it proper to post these log book pages on the
> cache
> >> site, or just keep em to myself, or would you all like to see them on a
> >> separate site? Maybe email the persons on the individual pages with a
> >> copy of their logs.
> >>
> >> What say you all?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20070618/ae8f9907/attachment.htm