[Az-Geocaching] Are the stats accurate?

Brian - Team A.I. listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:19:56 -0700


Brian,

According to Jeremy, they are about 90% done with a complete re-write of the
gc.com code.  Once this is complete, hopefully you can tweak things to mesh
with the new code and everything will work as it is supposed to.

Brian
Team A.I.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Cluff" <brian@Snaptek.com>
To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 12:20 PM
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Are the stats accurate?


> OK.. my earlier announcement might have been a bit premature... I found
> almost 300 caches that had been archived and weren't being counted at all.
> so... if everyone could checkout their numbers... if they are correct..
> YEAY!  If not, if you could use the new recovery feature and get the
> missing caches into the system.  The one exception is if you have any
> caches that are missing that are also archived... please send me the
> name and waypoint of the cache.  The recovery interface does not yet
> work on archived caches, and I would like to get the stats back to being
> dead on accurate ASAP.
>
> Brian Cluff
> Team Snapte
> AzGeocaching.com
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>