[Az-Geocaching] Re: Archived cache

[Eric Quinn]

Your cache, your rules. I would have deleted them as
well. They may have intended to log the trip as a note
and forgot that the default is a find and didn't
change it. 


Eric
Team Dragon

--- Scott Wood <wood@myblueheaven.com> wrote:
> At 09:51 PM 1/14/2002 -0700, you wrote:
> >It's not that easy.  I get emails from people
> telling me that such and
> >such a clue is missing.  Can I check it for them? 
> Then I get emails
> >from people who have driven 200+ miles looking for
> the next clue and let
> 
> I am having a whole new problem with the multi cache
> I put out down here in 
> Tucson.  So far I have 2 finds and 1 lost log entry.
>  The problem is that I 
> have had two other find logs that were actually not
> finds.  Both log 
> entries stated that they found the clue and planned
> on following the clues 
> over the next month or so, but still logged the
> cache as a find.
> 
> My real complaint about this is that I have clearly
> stated in the cache 
> description that it is not to be logged as a find
> until they reach the 
> final location.
> 
> I deleted the logs for both finds, and have not
> received any hate mail yet, 
> but...
> 
> 
> In liberty,
> 
> Scott
> 
> wood@myblueheaven.com
> www.myblueheaven.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> Az-Geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com
>
http://listserv.snaptek.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/