[Az-Geocaching] http://www.terracaching.com/
Robert & Linda Smith
Lrsmith at cableone.net
Tue Mar 15 10:17:20 MST 2005
Steven,
The wife and I will jump into your band wagon also. We are not the
least bit interested in the 3 examples you show. Just wish I could get
out more with what I have.
Bob Smith, Petite Elite
Brian Casteel wrote:
> I have to say that I'm leaning toward your court on this one.
>
> Brian
> Team A.I.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Steven Stringham <mailto:sstringh at stringham-family.org>
> *To:* listserv at azgeocaching.com <mailto:listserv at azgeocaching.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 15, 2005 5:54 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Az-Geocaching] http://www.terracaching.com/
>
> Ok,
> I spent some time looking at the site. Again, I am not excited.
>
> Things I like:
> 1) Locationless caches are back.
> 2) Virtuals are back.
> 3) Some excitement over the possibilities.
>
> Things I don't like:
> In some ways the self policing policy. Believe it or not. There
> are no overarching, controlled rules. It has quickly become the
> rebel site.Creating the virtual/locationless that would never have
> been approved on GC. In some ways I might be called a prude. Ok,
> so be it. But, I need a site to be family friendly. And, so far it
> does not seem to be. Examples:
> Locationless caches listed/discussed:
> 1) Logging a find in the nude (picture required).
> 2) Natural Birdies (nature's examples of giving you the finger).
> 3) Your local bordello. (Pictures/receipts/etc. required for
> logging a find).
>
> Ok, the possibilities of virtuals coming back is nice. But, not
> with this kind of stuff in the mix. I don't need it and I don't
> want it. Call me a prude, or whatever. But, that is how I feel.
> So, Terracaching is off my list for now.
>
> Steven Stringham
> StringCachers
>
More information about the Az-Geocaching
mailing list