[Az-Geocaching] http://www.terracaching.com/

Robert & Linda Smith Lrsmith at cableone.net
Tue Mar 15 10:17:20 MST 2005


Steven,
The wife and I will jump into your band wagon also.  We are not the 
least bit interested in the 3 examples you show.  Just wish I could get 
out more with what I have.
Bob Smith, Petite Elite

Brian Casteel wrote:

> I have to say that I'm leaning toward your court on this one.
>  
> Brian
> Team A.I.
>  
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* Steven Stringham <mailto:sstringh at stringham-family.org>
>     *To:* listserv at azgeocaching.com <mailto:listserv at azgeocaching.com>
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, March 15, 2005 5:54 AM
>     *Subject:* Re: [Az-Geocaching] http://www.terracaching.com/
>
>     Ok,
>     I spent some time looking at the site. Again, I am not excited.
>
>     Things I like:
>     1) Locationless caches are back.
>     2) Virtuals are back.
>     3) Some excitement over the possibilities.
>
>     Things I don't like:
>     In some ways the self policing policy. Believe it or not. There
>     are no overarching, controlled rules. It has quickly become the
>     rebel site.Creating the virtual/locationless that would never have
>     been approved on GC.  In some ways I might be called a prude. Ok,
>     so be it. But, I need a site to be family friendly. And, so far it
>     does not seem to be. Examples:
>     Locationless caches listed/discussed:
>     1) Logging a find in the nude (picture required).
>     2) Natural Birdies (nature's examples of giving you the finger).
>     3) Your local bordello. (Pictures/receipts/etc. required for
>     logging a find).
>
>     Ok, the possibilities of virtuals coming back is nice. But, not
>     with this kind of stuff in the mix. I don't need it and I don't
>     want it. Call me a prude, or whatever. But, that is how I feel.
>     So, Terracaching is off my list for now.
>
>     Steven Stringham
>     StringCachers
>



More information about the Az-Geocaching mailing list