[Az-Geocaching] Mo' bettah caches!

[Artemis Approver]

Because as I explained to him but he failed to share, it is not the
land manager of that park that groundspeak is concerned with. It is
the land managers of other parks who look at cache placements when
deciding if they should allow any more in there area.

It is the land manager in Nebraska who has decided after seeing
certain areas in California that the best way to avoid the same is to
ban all caches from Nebraska. ... And I quote "Geocaches may not be
placed in the Pioneers Park Nature Center in the western portion of
Pioneers Park, the Sunken Gardens, ot the Antelope Park Rose Garden
due to the sensetive nature of the landscape in these areas."

So as I explained to graldrich and received a nice 'that was a great
explaination' email from him. Groundspeak made the guidelines to
protect its interests in ALL areas that people cache.

Just as people from Oregon and NY come cache and leave caches here,
the land managers of other places will check on other states.



On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 21:53:05 -0700, Bill Tomlinson
<billtomlinson at qwest.net> wrote:
> I don't want to beat a dead horse (or a live one for that matter), but
> it seems I'm completely lost.  I'm reading two objections, but can't
> understand either.  First, you say that it is a matter of saturation,
> but as I read Graldrich's listing, he noted somewhere between .20 and
> .33 but when I look at the guidelines posted at geocaching.com, it says
> that caches must be placed at least .10 apart.  If the guidelines have
> changes, they should be posted.  Second, you mention the possibility of
> land managers getting upset, but graldrich said he would obtain
> management approval before placement (as we always should).  Seems to me
> they aren't going to get too upset if he does something they approve of.
>