[Az-Geocaching] READ THIS CACHE SITE -

Brian Casteel bcasteel at uccinc.net
Sun Apr 17 18:33:02 MST 2005


Given the history we've seen, I guess my response would be:

GO AWAY KEN.

I tried helping you in the past to understand how much this type of behavior 
upsets people, but it appears to have done no good.

Brian
Team A.I.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ShadowAce" <shadowace.az at gmail.com>
To: <listserv at azgeocaching.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] READ THIS CACHE SITE -


> Here is his reasons:
>
> - The travel bugs that I removed from this cache had been in the cache
> an average of 25 days each, and each of these travel bugs had been
> passed up by an average of 10 geocaching teams before I grabbed them.
> I took five travel bugs, but I immediately moved two of them to nearby
> caches later in the same day. I took pictures of those travel bugs and
> uploaded them to both my cache and travel bug log entries.
>
> - There is no need for a travel bug hotel in this location. There are
> many geocaches nearby with regular-sized containers. This is not in
> the middle of the city but is near the edge of Tonto National Forest.
> There are over 50 caches within a five-mile radius of this location,
> and most of these caches have containers that are large enough to fit
> most travel bugs. It may take a little more effort, but if one has
> multiple travel bugs, isn't it better to put them in a variety of
> different caches rather than one single cache?
>
> - This cache is exposed and is very close to a street corner. The
> cache site is close enough to be seen by motorists who are stopped at
> the stop sign. Whenever I come here, I see new litter desosited in the
> area, and usually I pick some of it up. There is good chance that this
> cache could be found accidentally by a non-geocacher, who would likely
> take the cache and/or it contents, especially since the contents
> contain a large variety of music and computer CDs which is more
> valuable than the contents of most caches. I do not like to put travel
> bugs in caches that I feel are too exposed.
>
> - The geocacher who commented on what I did on the cache page has
> nearly 1,000 cache findings, but has more than 2,000 travel bug
> findings. I, on the other hand, have close to 1,600 cache findings,
> but I have less than 400 travel bug finds. Enough said.
>
> Ken Akerman (a.k.a. Highpointer)
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
> 




More information about the Az-Geocaching mailing list