[Az-Geocaching] Open Invitation to all and CHICKS with TRUCKS
a challeng...
patrick hopkins
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 10:28:43 -0700 (MST)
--WebTV-Mail-24508-1259
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
we have been reading some of the comments being made here.
if any of you have ever found any of our caches, you will know that they
are never too far away from where we can park our 4x4. not lazy mind
you , just getting up in years a little.
so if there are some of you who dont approve of this, then make a list
of the "too easy" type of cachers, and seek elsewhere.
because we INTEND TO CONTINUE to place caches out there. we will
continue to make them as challenging and fun as is possible for us, but
dont expect to find any on a mountaintop.!!
team lake havasu. ( wendy, patrick, and dog )
--WebTV-Mail-24508-1259
Content-Disposition: Inline
Content-Type: Message/RFC822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Received: from smtpin-2103.public.lawson.webtv.net (172.16.213.113) by
storefull-2178.public.lawson.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Sun, 22 Sep
2002 09:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns2.sequoia.net (wsip68-14-243-57.ph.ph.cox.net
[68.14.243.57]) by smtpin-2103.public.lawson.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws)
with ESMTP id C937EFE46 for <h43@webtv.net>; Sun, 22 Sep 2002
09:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
ns2.sequoia.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA12947; Sun, 22 Sep
2002 10:20:32 -0700
Received: from sequoia.net (SEQUOIA.NET [207.246.52.5]) by ns2.sequoia.net (8.9.3/8.9.3)
with ESMTP id KAA12932 for <az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com>;
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 10:18:43 -0700
Received: from fed1mtao01.cox.net (fed1mtao01.cox.net [68.6.19.244]) by
sequoia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D3324A836 for <listserv@azgeocaching.com>;
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 10:09:25 -0700 (MST)
Received: from cartman.myblueheaven.com ([68.0.148.110]) by
fed1mtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05
201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id <20020922165704.ZMYF14888.fed1mtao01.cox.net@cartman.myblueheaven.com>
for <listserv@azgeocaching.com>; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 12:57:04 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020922094706.00b73aa0@mail.myblueheaven.com>
X-Sender: wood#myblueheaven.com@mail.myblueheaven.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
From: Scott Wood <wood@myblueheaven.com>
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Open Invitation to all and CHICKS with TRUCKS
a challeng...
In-Reply-To: <001c01c2623e$349b90e0$b010b83f@fishkiller>
References: <119.17c600c6.2abec66b@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=====================_44895326==_.ALT"
Sender: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
Errors-To: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
X-BeenThere: az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.7
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
List-Help: <mailto:az-geocaching-request@listserv.azgeocaching.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching>,
<mailto:az-geocaching-request@listserv.azgeocaching.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: List for discussing Geocaching in Arizona <az-geocaching.listserv.azgeocaching.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching>,
<mailto:az-geocaching-request@listserv.azgeocaching.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 09:57:02 -0700
--=====================_44895326==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 06:44 AM 9/22/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>I look forward to the picnic as well
>
> I as a cacher who has found several of their caches decided to offer
> suggestions but for some unknown reason they took it as an attack, it is
> sad that they took the archive approach as they had some nice areas to visit...
I have been trying to come up with a reply to your original post as well,
but Kelly of Team Roadrunners pretty much said everything that I would have
said.
I think they might have gotten upset because of the somewhat elitist sound
your message had. It is frankly none of your business how they place their
caches, and you have no right to ask them to archive any of their
caches. While some of their caches might be open to some criticism, others
have been enjoyable caches. The reality of the matter is that if I don't
like the way that they hide caches, I just won't go and look for them. You
said that they would have the respect of the geocaching community if they
archived their caches. You don't speak for me, or for the geocaching
community for that matter, none of us do. CwT have my respect because they
took the time to go out and hide caches for people to find. I don't care
if they are easy urban caches, or harder rural ones, I enjoy finding both.
Far too many people seem to want to turn themselves into Cache Police for
some reason. I can't see this as being a positive for this game.
Scott
Team My Blue Heaven
www.myblueheaven.com/geocache
--=====================_44895326==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<html>
At 06:44 AM 9/22/2002 -0700, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2>I look
forward to the picnic as well </font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2> I as a cacher who has found several
of their caches decided to offer suggestions but for some unknown reason
they took it as an attack, it is sad that they took the archive approach
as they had some nice areas to visit...</font></blockquote><br>
I have been trying to come up with a reply to your original post as well,
but Kelly of Team Roadrunners pretty much said everything that I would
have said.<br><br>
I think they might have gotten upset because of the somewhat elitist
sound your message had. It is frankly none of your business how
they place their caches, and you have no right to ask them to archive any
of their caches. While some of their caches might be open to some
criticism, others have been enjoyable caches. The reality of the
matter is that if I don't like the way that they hide caches, I just
won't go and look for them. You said that they would have the
respect of the geocaching community if they archived their caches.
You don't speak for me, or for the geocaching community for that matter,
none of us do. CwT have my respect because they took the time to go
out and hide caches for people to find. I don't care if they are
easy urban caches, or harder rural ones, I enjoy finding both.<br><br>
Far too many people seem to want to turn themselves into Cache Police for
some reason. I can't see this as being a positive for this
game.<br><br>
<br>
<div>Scott</div>
<div>Team My Blue Heaven</div>
<div><a href="http://www.myblueheaven.com/geocache" EUDORA=AUTOURL>www.myblueheaven.com/geocache</a></div>
</html>
--=====================_44895326==_.ALT--
_______________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
--WebTV-Mail-24508-1259--